Plannotator is a specialized tool for interactive plan and code review designed for developers and teams working with AI coding agents. It provides a visual UI to annotate agent-generated plans and review code diffs before execution, enabling precise control over AI-driven development workflows. The tool natively integrates with popular agents like Claude Code, OpenCode, Pi, and Codex, running locally to keep data secure while offering a seamless review experience that intercepts the agent's approval step automatically. Its core value lies in transforming the opaque process of agent interaction into a transparent, collaborative review surface, ensuring developers own the specification and final output.
A significant pain point Plannotator addresses is the lack of proper review mechanisms for AI agent outputs, which often leads to developers squinting at terminal text or rubber-stamping plans without meaningful oversight. When an agent proposes a plan or writes code, traditional workflows force developers to either accept the output blindly or engage in cumbersome manual feedback loops involving copy-pasting and retyping. This inefficiency matters because it reduces the reliability of agent-assisted development and creates friction in iterative refinement. Plannotator solves this by providing a dedicated review workspace that mirrors familiar code review practices, allowing developers to catch errors, refine scope, and guide the agent with structured feedback before any code is executed or committed.
One major feature group is Plan Review, which allows users to annotate an agent's proposed plan before it executes. This works by automatically hooking into the agent's plan step and presenting the plan in a proper review interface where users can select text, mark sections for deletion, add inline comments, or write replacements. The annotations export as structured feedback that the agent understands, enabling precise communication. This is useful because it gives developers a visual way to control the agent's scope and direction, with features like version history tracking every revision and diff views showing changes between iterations, ensuring full auditability and iterative improvement.
Another major feature group is Code Review, which provides a PR-style diff viewer for agent-written code before committing. Users run the `/plannotator-review` command to get a side-by-side or unified diff view of the agent's uncommitted changes, complete with file tree navigation and line-level annotations for code suggestions. This workflow applies the same rigorous review process used for human PRs to agent output, allowing developers to stage or unstage files and provide specific feedback. The feature is critical for maintaining code quality, as it enables developers to catch bugs, suggest optimizations, and ensure style consistency directly within the familiar context of a diff viewer.
admin
Additional capabilities include a suite of slash commands and integrations that extend Plannotator's functionality. Commands like `/plannotator-annotate` let users annotate any markdown file, spec, folder, or URL and send feedback, while `/plannotator-last` targets the agent's last message for review. The tool integrates with VS Code to open plans in editor tabs with diff views and editor annotations, and with Obsidian and Bear for auto-saving plans to knowledge bases with frontmatter, tags, and project metadata. It also supports reviewing GitHub and GitLab pull requests by URL, bringing the same annotation workflow to external code reviews. These integrations ensure Plannotator fits seamlessly into existing developer toolchains.
Plannotator's overall workflow is straightforward and designed for zero learning curve. First, users work with their coding agent normally; when the agent proposes a plan, Plannotator intercepts the approval step automatically. Second, instead of reviewing terminal text, users get a proper review workspace to annotate inline, mark changes, and approve or deny with structured feedback—owning the specification. Third, annotations are sent directly to the agent as structured feedback, eliminating copy-pasting and retyping so the agent revises based on exact instructions. This three-step process ensures feedback flows back efficiently, turning agent interactions into collaborative, iterative dialogues rather than one-way commands.
Concrete use cases include refining an agent's implementation plan for a new feature, where a developer can mark unnecessary sections for deletion and add comments to clarify requirements, resulting in a more focused and accurate plan. Another scenario is reviewing agent-generated code for a bug fix, using the diff viewer to spot logical errors and annotate line-level suggestions, leading to cleaner, correct code before commit. Teams can share plans via encrypted URLs for collaborative review, ensuring alignment without exposing sensitive data. Developers using knowledge bases can auto-save plans to Obsidian vaults with tags, turning agent workflows into searchable documentation. Each use case delivers the outcome of greater control, higher quality output, and reduced rework.
Plannotator targets developers, engineering teams, and technical leads who use AI coding agents like Claude Code, OpenCode, Pi, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Kiro, Droid, and Amp, particularly those who need oversight in agent-assisted development. It runs locally, ensuring plans never leave the user's machine, and is free and open-source with a hosted team layer called Workspaces for shared plans and review history. The tech stack integrates via hooks or slash commands where supported, with native support for VS Code and other editors. The takeaway is that Plannotator transforms AI agent collaboration from a black box into a transparent, reviewable process, giving developers the tools to shape what gets built and own what ships.
Plannotator is for developers, engineering teams, and technical leads who use AI coding agents like Claude Code, OpenCode, Pi, Codex, Copilot, Gemini, Kiro, Droid, and Amp. It targets those needing oversight and collaboration in agent-assisted development, particularly teams wanting to review plans and code before execution, integrate agent workflows into existing tools like VS Code and Obsidian, and maintain code quality through structured feedback loops.